During his visit to the U.K. in May, Prince Harry was reportedly offered a place to stay with the royal
Reporters made much of Prince Harry’s visit to the U.K. in May and his canceled appointment with King Charles III, but his lodging arrangement tells a subtle story as well. The prince had planned to see his father after an event related to the Invictus Games, but the meeting was canceled due to the king’s busy schedule, and the prince left the country the next morning. According to a report by The Sunday Times, the king offered his son a place to stay in a royal residence, but Prince Harry chose to find a hotel instead.
The Duke of Sussex is believed to choose a hotel instead of a royal residence because, according to The Daily Telegraph, the offer did not come with police protection. The newspaper suggests that had he accepted, it might have given father and son an opportunity to see each other.
Pundits speculated a lot about Prince Harry’s canceled meeting with the king, debating who “snubbed” whom and reading into the situation from every angle. For some, the fact that the king offered Prince Harry a place to stay was an important detail – perhaps an olive branch or an invitation to a more discrete meeting.
Others thought it was a maneuver meant to put the prince off guard, and that he was smart to avoid it. Whatever the case, it’s clear that the terms of a meeting between Pricne Harry and the royal family are more nuanced than ever.
Prince Harry visited the U.K. for the first time in months for a celebration of the 10th anniversary of The Invictus Games. The event was held in the afternoon at St. Paul’s Cathedral – just two miles away from Buckingham Palace where the king was hosting the annual garden party at the same time. The two were scheduled for a private meeting when both events ended at 6 p.m., but an official royal spokesperson announced that it had to be canceled due to the king’s busy schedule.
In response to the many inquiries and continued speculation on whether or not the Duke will meet with his father while in the U.K. this week, it unfortunately will not be possible due to His Majesty’s full program,” they said. “The Duke of course is understanding of his father’s diary of commitments and various other priorities and hopes to see him soon.”
News outlets got different explanations, though mostly from anonymous sources. Royal expert Charlotte Griffiths told The Post: “I think the reason was because Harry made certain demands about who could be in the room and who couldn’t. Although on the surface it looks like a snub, Harry made it very difficult for his father. Maybe other forces were driving Charles’ position on this. William may have had a thought about how this meeting should be conducted or whether it should be conducted at all.”
Hot news
The British family pledge to put an end to Harry and Meghan Markle’s ‘personal’ trips abroad: ‘Need bold and determined action’
Despite stepping down from royal duties in 2020 and being banned from official engagements, Harry and Meghan recently spent three days in Nigeria. Their visit included promoting the Invictus Games, visiting a school, and inspecting a military parade—activities reminiscent of a full royal tour.
Tom Sykes, royal editor for The Daily Beast, told The Express, “Everywhere they went in Nigeria, they were greeted as royalty.”
Harry and Meghan’s visit to Nigeria, which appeared much like a state visit, was at the invitation of Christopher Muse, Chief of Defence Staff of the West African nation, aiming to promote the Invictus Games. Nigeria is considering hosting the sporting event in the future.
Critics argue that these visits promote the couple’s personal initiatives. Sykes noted, “The royals can’t stop them from doing more tours, but the government might seek to apply serious diplomatic pressure on friendly states not to host these quasi-royal tours.”
He believes more visits like the one to Nigeria are likely, suggesting that “Harry and Meghan are effectively declaring that they will continue to leverage their royal status.”
Meghan Markle faces UNANTICIPATED criticism: The brutal seven-word swipe from Nigeria’s First Lady
In a brutal seven-word swipe, Nigeria’s First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu said: “We don’t accept nakedness in our culture.”
Senator Tinubu has caused a stir with her comments about Meghan Markle’s attire during the royal couple’s recent visit to the country. The Duchess of Sussex, known for her fashion-forward choices, faced criticism from the First Lady, who seemed to take issue with Meghan’s wardrobe.
The Event: Celebrating the Woman
The incident occurred during an event titled “Celebrating the Woman,” where Senator Tinubu acknowledged the significant contributions of women in all aspects of life. While praising women’s achievements, she made a veiled reference to Meghan Markle, emphasizing the need for cultural sensitivity.
The Controversial Remarks
Addressing the gathering, Senator Tinubu stated, “We are not having a Met Gala. The nakedness is just everywhere, and the men are well-clothed. So we have to do something. Tell them we don’t accept nakedness in our culture. That is not beautiful. It’s not beautiful at all.”
She further stressed that both males and females must be confident in their identity and not emulate American cinema stars. “They don’t know where they come from. Why did Meghan come here looking for Africa? We know who we are. Don’t lose who you are,” she asserted.
When the First Lady of Nigeria puts your name, nakedness and ignorance about your identity in the same sentence…
Ouch!!! pic.twitter.com/qP5ubpEyNL— Melanated Mona (@Melanated_Mona) May 25, 2024
Royal Fans React
Following the First Lady’s speech, royal fans expressed their opinions. One fan commented, “Meghan Markle managed to create an international incident! We warned her about the clothes.” Another added, “I am glad the First Lady sees how some visitors choose to disrespect Nigeria’s people & culture. It was disgraceful to dress that way, especially in the presence of children. It is a pattern of behavior for Meghan & Harry.”
Meghan and Harry’s Successful Trip
Despite the controversy, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s three-day Nigeria trip was deemed successful. The royal couple met with top officials and locals, engaging in various activities. However, Meghan’s fashion choices became a focal point, leading to this unexpected clash between cultural norms and modern style.
The clash between tradition and contemporary fashion highlights the challenges faced by public figures like Meghan Markle. As the Duchess continues to navigate her royal role, she must balance personal expression with cultural sensitivity—a delicate dance that captures global attention.
Prince Harry faces BARRAGE OF BRUTIAL CRITICISM in the US with Pat Tillman Award, with royal fans fervently advocating for the return of Invictus Games to its ‘true’ founders Prince William and Princess Catherine
Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has found himself at the center of a heated debate in the United States after being nominated for the prestigious Pat Tillman Award for Service at the ESPY Awards. While some applaud the recognition, others question whether he truly embodies the spirit of the award.
The Pat Tillman Award: A Legacy of Selflessness
The Pat Tillman Award is named in honor of Pat Tillman, a former NFL player and US Army Ranger who made the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan. Tillman abandoned a lucrative football career to serve his country, and his legacy is one of selflessness and unwavering commitment.
Tillman’s mother’s disapproval
Mary Tillman, the mother of Pat Tillman, expressed her shock and disappointment at ESPN’s choice. She was never consulted about the decision to give the award to Prince Harry. In an interview with the Daily Mail, she stated, “I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award.” Mary Tillman believes there are more deserving recipients within the veteran community who lack the privilege and resources that Prince Harry possesses.
Pat McAfee’s Critique
Sports analyst and former NFL punter Pat McAfee minced no words when expressing his opinion about Prince Harry’s nomination. He criticized the ESPY Awards for their decision, arguing that it does not align with the award’s intended purpose. According to McAfee, the award should go to someone with a strong connection to sports who has served others in a manner reflective of Pat Tillman’s legacy.
Departure from Royal Duties
McAfee also pointed out that Prince Harry’s departure from royal duties raises questions about his eligibility for the award. “It’s going to Prince Harry,” McAfee quipped, “who I don’t even think is a prince anymore.” The departure from his royal role has left some wondering whether Harry’s current path truly reflects the selflessness associated with the award.
Lack of Due Diligence?
The controversy extends to the ESPY Awards’ selection process. Winners are chosen through global online fan voting from candidates selected by the ESPY Select Nominating Committee. McAfee criticized this process, suggesting that it lacked due diligence. He questioned whether the committee thoroughly researched its candidates before making the nominations.
Fan Reactions
McAfee summed up the sentiment among sports fans succinctly: “Hey, don’t be putting our f***ing guy with that guy.” The immediate reaction from many is one of skepticism, wondering if Prince Harry truly belongs in the same category as Pat Tillman.
Some even require the Invictus Games to be returned to Prince William and Princess Catherine, who they believe to be its ‘true’ founders.
In the end, the debate continues, and the ESPY Awards’ decision to nominate Prince Harry remains a topic of intense discussion. Whether he deserves the Pat Tillman Award or not, the controversy underscores the importance of honoring those who embody selflessness and service in the world of sports.
Hungry-for-spotlight Meghan Markle caught on the spot yelling and calling herself ‘new Princess Diana’
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of drama herself, has apparently been caught screaming that she’s the new Princess Diana. But is she really fit to step into the iconic shoes of the beloved people’s princess? Let’s dive into the drama, the envy, and the audacity that define Meghan’s royal journey.
Well-known royal biographer Tom Bower recently revealed in the book “House of Beckham” that after her marriage to Prince Harry, Meghan Markle came to see herself as the “new Diana.”
The Spotlight and the Vegemite Sandwich
According to Tom Bower, our resident Royal gossip digger, Meghan got a taste of the spotlight during her Australian tour and suddenly thought she was the second coming of Diana. It’s like she took one bite of a Vegemite sandwich and decided she was the Queen of Hearts. But here’s the kicker: Meghan was apparently miffed that she was subservient to Kate in the Royal pecking order. Well, excuse me, Your Highness, but that’s monarchy for you. It’s not a democracy where you can campaign your way to the top.
The New Diana? Not Quite
Let’s talk about this new Diana business. Diana was unique. She was special. And frankly, Meghan, you’re no Diana. You can’t just declare yourself the new version of someone else. There’s no princess factory churning out Diana 2.0. But wait, there’s more. Apparently, our Duchess of delusion was also green with envy over Victoria Beckham’s wealth. Marrying into the British royal family and worrying about keeping up with Posh Spice? That’s like winning the lottery and being jealous of your neighbor’s new car.
Hypocrisy and Audacity
Meghan claimed she wanted privacy, yet here she is allegedly screaming about being the new Diana and sulking over the Beckhams’ wealth. The hypocrisy is enough to make your head spin. And speaking of audacity, Meghan flounced off to California with Harry in tow, upset that she’s not as wealthy as the Beckhams. Cry me a river, sweetheart.
Harry: From Cheeky Prince to Puppet
Poor Harry – he’s like a puppet on a string, dancing to Meghan’s tune. He’s gone from being the cheeky, lovable prince to, well, whatever he is now – a shadow of his former self, spouting off about living authentically while his wife apparently dreams of being his dead mother. It’s not just sad, it’s downright creepy.
The Transparent Role
Meghan seems to be playing a role – the hard-done-by royal, the misunderstood Duchess, the voice of a generation. But we can see right through it. It’s as transparent as the Emperor’s New Clothes and about as convincing.
Diana’s Legacy
Diana earned her place in people’s hearts. She worked tirelessly for charitable causes, connecting with people on a genuine level. She wasn’t out there trying to be someone else or competing with other celebrities. She was just Diana. Meghan, on the other hand, is a different story.
The Reverse Cinderella
Diana never chose to leave the royal family. She continued to work for her charities, to be there for William and Harry. Meghan? She couldn’t get out of Britain fast enough. She was like Cinderella in reverse, turning her glass slipper into a pumpkin and high-tailing it back to LA.
Royal expert claims Meghan Markle unlikely to return to the UK with Prince Harry in the near future, despite Prince William and Princess Kate’s invitation.
Meghan Markle’s return to the UK is highly unlikely, claims a royal expert. While Prince Harry is scheduled to visit London in the coming months, Markle accompanying him with their children is not happening anytime soon. Recent reports suggested that Prince William and Princess Kate have been working to mend the royal rift and extended an invitation to the estranged family member, but Meghan declined the request.
Meghan Markle is avoiding a trip to the UK
As confirmed by Harry himself and considering his plans to attend the Invictus Games event in May, the Duke of Sussex will make a quick trip to the UK. Earlier, Harry also expressed his desire to visit his ailing father, King Charles, who has been diagnosed with cancer. While many speculated that Meghan would accompany him to the palace, royal commentator Esther Krakue, in conversation with GB News, suggested that might not be the case.
“I actually think she’s avoiding the UK because she’s not interested in the whole drama and, kind of, being injected, is she going to talk to [Princess] Kate, and all of that.” Esther Krakue told the outlet.
Meghan Markle ‘concerned’ about the safety
Things haven’t been going so well for the royals lately. Court cases, health issues, and the general state of affairs have been off the rails. Meghan is thought to be keeping a low profile due to security concerns after Harry lost a high court case against the Home Office, as well as a desire to avoid further conflict between her and Princess Kate.
“I personally think she’s not going to come because, obviously, Harry has lost his case with the Home Office and he said he doesn’t feel safe bringing his family over [to the UK] and I also think this is going to be a time where distance between the Sussexes and the Royal Family will be calcified because the focus will obviously be on the Princess of Wales and the King recovering, they don’t need the whole Netflix drama.” Claims Krakue.
Prince Harry’s court battle
Harry and Meghan have been residing in the US since they left the UK in early 2020 after announcing their decision to leave the royal family. Earlier this year, Harry lost a legal battle against the UK Home Office and RAVEC at the High Court in the United Kingdom. The Duke wanted to overturn a decision that reduced his security classification after he was no longer a “working royal” due to fears for his own safety and the safety of his wife, Meghan Markle, and two children Archie and Lilibet.
Leave a Reply